KM for Librarians: View from the Executive Suite
Dave Pollard knows his stuff. The slides will be posted on the Knowledge Management Division's section of the SLA website. Caveat: please review the handouts/materials as what I have written are in no way complete and represent interesting thoughts that I want to consider/explore later.
In this session, Mr. Pollard was the only speaker. He was a good speaker, but was in the unfortunate position of being right after lunch. His slides tracked his speech pretty well.
Leaders are concerned about mitigating risk, reducing costs, strengthening key customer relationships, and increasing the value of people. Leaders of companies want to know how librarians and knowledge workers can help with these concerns.
In many cases, relationships are more important than knowledge. People will choose, even vendors, based on the quality of relationships with representatives rather than facts.
Mr. Pollard said that people don't know as much about resources as they should. Many of them will acknowledge that they can search, but cannot research. After some training (by information professionals?) they begin to understand what it takes to do research and that knowledge makes people appreciate information professionals more. It also makes them willing to turn questions over to the library staff.
One idea to pass on to senior management is to suggest e-mail groups by subject matter or knowledge in a certain area. Knowledge can cross practice areas and these kinds of groups can alleviate messages to all staff and get more targeted results.
People want to know who owns KM and what the librarian role is?
- there is no agreement on what KM is, does and who owns it or if it is needed.
- Type D (disintermediation) view: it's everyone's job. If people can't do it, get rid of them.
- Important information is in people's heads (institutional memory)
- Type R (reintermediation) view: business units own the content
- If KM is about learning, HR owns it.
- If KM is about infrastructure (technology), then IT owns it. They have the budget as well.
There is a perception that librrians have 2 roles: research and cataloging /responsibility for metadata. Librarians have to specialize or they will be outsourced. By specializing they become subject matter specialists, but there is a fine line. Libarians should not specialize so much that they get disconnected from the vision and business of the company.
Where does KM fit in? What is the mission of KM?
-Extranets are usually not used by customers. They are used primarily used by competitors, recruits, alumni. Customers want information delivered their way not a way that is convenient to their vendor.
-New technology (MySpace) is intriguing. Should orgs use it?
Some interesting technologies Mr. Pollard mentioned are:
Help executives assess the cost of not knowing. After a crisis the relevant departments that provide information usually experience a funding increase, more responsibility, because the cost of not knowing something has inccreased. As time goes on, people forget and the cost of not knowing goes down, e.g. what is the cost of not knowing about your company's SARS infection?
Labels: Conferences
